Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jules’ favorite bike 1928 101 Scout

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FLFD7
    replied
    More primary….

    IMG_2513.jpeg IMG_2514.jpeg

    Pulled the idler gear and rollers

    IMG_2515.jpeg

    Removed the inner primary cover

    IMG_2516.jpeg

    Took off drive gear

    IMG_2517.jpeg

    And then the transmission

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    The clutch….

    IMG_2503.jpeg IMG_2504.jpeg
    IMG_2505.jpeg

    I used the Indian clutch spring compressing tool to remove the nuts holding the outer cover on. Under these nuts Indian uses small thin washers that are meant to be folded over the edge of the plate and a flat on the nut to keep the nut from loosening. Jules used shake proofs….
    And he used to call me a cheap Dutchman….cmon man…

    IMG_2509.jpeg IMG_2510.jpeg

    A lot of corrosion on the clutch plates, a couple of the fiber plates are stuck together, fortunately I have others.

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    Moving over to the primary side I find this….

    IMG_2498.jpeg

    Early 101s had a vent line on the left side of the crankcase. To improve oiling to the valve train they moved the vent to the timing cover in I think 29? The dealer had to modify the right side case and cover to accommodate the vent line on that side, and was supposed to cover the vent hole on the left side with a little flat plate. Which I guess Jules didn’t have, so he took an old vent cover and threaded a plug in the bottom. Nice…

    IMG_2497.jpeg IMG_2501.jpeg

    IMG_2502.jpeg IMG_2499.jpeg

    After taking off the outer primary I see more evidence of corrosion, this motor was definitely under water. Next up take the clutch apart.

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    After taking the mag off I pulled the pinion gear with the Indian tool (and a little heat and penetrating oil).

    IMG_2484.jpeg

    Before using the puller I had to take the nut off the pinion shaft, and I got a little surprise….

    IMG_2488.jpeg IMG_2487.jpeg

    It wasn’t the it I was expecting, it a home made left hand thread hex screw. Only thing I can think of is Jules broke off the threaded end of the pinion shaft so he cut that off, drilled and tapped the shaft and made the screw?

    All I know for sure is I better not lose that screw….

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    I haven’t heard of ashless oil, but I have heard of ashless chaps…..

    Anyway, time to start tearing this down.

    I’ll start on the timing side

    IMG_2473.jpeg IMG_2474.jpeg

    Oil pump and vent line off, then pull the timing cover.

    IMG_2479.jpeg IMG_2480.jpeg IMG_2482.jpeg

    Emptied out the timing chest. The back cylinder has shorter pushrods then the front, and the grooved ones are for the exhaust valve (Jules had them with the intakes). No biggie.

    Leave a comment:


  • T. Cotten
    replied
    "Total Loss" always made perfect sense to me, Folks...

    (I had no personal experience owning such a machine, however I had a panhead that came close!)

    Eliminating oil control rings works best with an ashless oil.

    ....Cotten

    Leave a comment:


  • dukekleman
    replied
    Quote from Gene,

    "I had many long discussions with George Yarocki about oil control rings. He was adamant about not using them. His argument was "These engines were designed to burn oil so the top end gets lubrication." I disagreed, arguing that the early engines burned oil as a consequence of the design, Good oil control methods hadn't been figured out yet. In my mind, if burning oil is such a good thing, why do modern engines go to such great lengths to prevent it? Oil burning in the combustion chamber is not good, it leaves carbon deposits which break off and move around, causing damage to the bore, pistons, rings etc. Also builds up on the exhaust valve stem and can stick the valve open. I've always run cast iron oil control rings with cam ground aluminum pistons. Over the decades I've put an honest 15,000 miles on my 24 Chief w/ sidecar and 5000 on my 24 Excelsior. They both will use less than 1 qt of oil in 300 miles, most of which I dump out at every gas stop and reset the level in the crankcase. It's cheap insurance to dump a couple ounces of oil every 75 miles or so. I fit the piston clearance on the Chief (3 1/4" bore) at .0065". The Excelsior I fitted at .006". These numbers are for cam ground pistons, which Indian didn't have back in the day.

    Of course oil control also needs to be managed at the oil pump. With Oil control rings, the mechanical pump needs to be turned way down, unless your engine is leaking all over the place! This is another reason to change oil every gas stop. The small amount of oil in the engine does a lot of work and breaks down quickly, so replacing frequently is a good idea. I like my engines tight and clean, I hate oil leaks! Good oil control rings and proper pump adjustment go a long way here, plus I put a lip seal on the magneto gear..."

    Gene I couldn't agree more!!!
    It's all about oil control and mitigation of oil leaks...
    Another Huge annoyance is the sound of exhaust leaks in my book, causes poor running issues as well.

    Duke Kleman

    Leave a comment:


  • T. Cotten
    replied
    Originally posted by gharper View Post
    Joe,

    I wouldn't worry about different size pistons, the engine won't know or care. I would however, do the best I could to get the total piston assemblies the same weight. That will help your balance issues and make the engine a bit smoother. You can often remove some material from the underside of the heavy piston if the tops are thick. Otherwise, add some lead weight into the center of the wrist pin on the lighter one as needed to get them equal weight....
    A waste of time, Gene!

    With a single-throw motor, there is only one reciprocating mass in the balance formula: The total.

    Making them equal is as pointless as shaving the top of the female rod to a toothpick to make it equal to the male.

    But whatever makes you sleep better.... .. .

    ....Cotten

    Leave a comment:


  • gharper
    replied
    Joe,

    I wouldn't worry about different size pistons, the engine won't know or care. I would however, do the best I could to get the total piston assemblies the same weight. That will help your balance issues and make the engine a bit smoother. You can often remove some material from the underside of the heavy piston if the tops are thick. Otherwise, add some lead weight into the center of the wrist pin on the lighter one as needed to get them equal weight.

    I had many long discussions with George Yarocki about oil control rings. He was adamant about not using them. His argument was "These engines were designed to burn oil so the top end gets lubrication." I disagreed, arguing that the early engines burned oil as a consequence of the design, Good oil control methods hadn't been figured out yet. In my mind, if burning oil is such a good thing, why do modern engines go to such great lengths to prevent it? Oil burning in the combustion chamber is not good, it leaves carbon deposits which break off and move around, causing damage to the bore, pistons, rings etc. Also builds up on the exhaust valve stem and can stick the valve open. I've always run cast iron oil control rings with cam ground aluminum pistons. Over the decades I've put an honest 15,000 miles on my 24 Chief w/ sidecar and 5000 on my 24 Excelsior. They both will use less than 1 qt of oil in 300 miles, most of which I dump out at every gas stop and reset the level in the crankcase. It's cheap insurance to dump a couple ounces of oil every 75 miles or so. I fit the piston clearance on the Chief (3 1/4" bore) at .0065". The Excelsior I fitted at .006". These numbers are for cam ground pistons, which Indian didn't have back in the day.

    Of course oil control also needs to be managed at the oil pump. With Oil control rings, the mechanical pump needs to be turned way down, unless your engine is leaking all over the place! This is another reason to change oil every gas stop. The small amount of oil in the engine does a lot of work and breaks down quickly, so replacing frequently is a good idea. I like my engines tight and clean, I hate oil leaks! Good oil control rings and proper pump adjustment go a long way here, plus I put a lip seal on the magneto gear...

    Hope this helps.

    Gene

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    I agree, and I wouldn’t mess with the .020 over cylinder. But if I got a set of .030 cylinders that’ll work makes sense to use them.

    Leave a comment:


  • T. Cotten
    replied
    Seriously, Joe,...

    Jules knew that the motor doesn't care if the cylinders are the same bore.

    Hogging one out to match the other is a waste.

    ....Cotten


    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    Just some pictures comparing the pistons…
    IMG_2286.jpeg IMG_2290.jpeg IMG_2289.jpeg IMG_2291.jpeg

    Notice how thick the original pistons are, and the later pistons a bit taller.

    The recommendation in the 101 R&O manual is to use the later pistons and all three compression rings but either leave off the oil ring or use the oil ring but leave a big end gap. Since Jules used the oil ring on both these motors that’s what I’ll do.

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    One note is that the black painted cylinders had original 101 pistons. They have two thick compression rings and no oil control ring (total loss oil). They also are sized for .010 clearance in the bore for aluminum pistons as opposed to .003 clearance for the later Sport Scouts. If they were iron pistons, then .003 clearance.

    IMG_2287.jpeg IMG_2288.jpeg

    So the original pistons measure .007 smaller then the later ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    But wait, there’s more…

    IMG_2282.jpeg

    Not only did Jules use two different pistons, they are different size bores…ugh. The front cylinder .020 over, the rear cylinder .060 over. C’mon man…..

    IMG_2283.jpeg

    The cylinders originally on the bike are .030 over.
    I have another set of cylinders that also measure .030 over and look to be in better shape.

    IMG_2284.jpeg

    They look good but have been painted black. I got another set of cylinders that the .030 pistons drop right in but the .060 piston doesn’t, so they are either .040 or .050 over.
    IMG_2285.jpeg

    So I’m going to mull over what to do. I don’t want to bore the spare motor front cylinder to .060 over, if nothing else but for time and expense. I’m leaning to using the black painted cylinders, I have new .030 over pistons, but no rings (I looked and Greer out of stock on all the Scout pistons and rings).

    Leave a comment:


  • FLFD7
    replied
    Well, I pulled the cylinders to see what’s what and, well, not great news… IMG_2267.jpeg IMG_2269.jpeg

    Yep, two different pistons…

    IMG_2268.jpeg

    On the plus side the bores looked good, no gouges…
    But on the bad side….

    IMG_2279.jpeg IMG_2280.jpeg

    A lot of rust, so this gotta come apart, something I was hoping to avoid. I’m guessing this spare motor was under water at some point, just like the bike.

    Sigh….its always something….

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X