Originally posted by c.o.
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
the first Harley's
Collapse
X
-
Be sure to visit;
http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/
-
Originally posted by c.o. View PostWell at a quick glance scrolling up and down the page I see a difference in seat and pipes for sure.....possibly fork rockers but the image I posted is a little fuzzy. I'll have to find a better pic. I guess it's likely the museum machine has been messed with. I went through the '09 chapter in Herb's book but it doesn't let on to the bike's correctness. I also found a caption in "Classic Harley-Davidson" (which Herb co-wrote) that eludes to it being "the rarest of the rare".Be sure to visit;
http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/
Comment
-
They were actually listed as a model in the 1909 Sales Brochure.Be sure to visit;
http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chris Haynes View PostIt is commonly thought that, that photo was taken in 1924. I say this because that negative number and negatives of several other teens and preteens machines are all together in between photos of the 1923/1924 models.
Comment
-
Single not a Twin
Originally posted by c.o. View PostDid any of the early straptank twins survive? I seem to recall reading an article that Herb wrote awhile back that said that possibly one example is still kicking around but I'm not positive on it.
So while the rumor was correct (that Mr. Lang took a bike to FL), the rumor bike had the wrong motor in it -- if I can put it that way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by silentgreyfello View PostNotice on the "1907" twin that it has the gas tank with the filler in the front. I thought it was determined that this was a feature of 1908?
Is the Dec. 07 twin pictured the Feb 07 bike (unpictured) with a few possible updates altho still running a rigid fork? Or did they build a new example?Last edited by HarleyCreation; 08-29-2009, 11:35 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Earl View PostGreat thought Jurassic !!
What we've learned so far is that we need to question and investigate the early models ourselves, and not to believe something, just because the Factory said so.
It's hard to believe that HD would have a complete, intact, never changed 1909 model twin motorcycle for their collection. Possible, but not likely. Maybe we should start looking at this machine the same way we've studied other early models, by looking at original advertising and sales info, and period photographs.
However, I believe they had "parts" of this same 09 twin at the Factory much earlier. That is, sometime in the teens they mentioned having an 09 twin lying around.
But the 09 twin as configured now was NEVER built that way originally by H-D IMHO. It's got one big huge obvious flaw that I believe I see plus other anomalies.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarleyCreation View PostI heard from a guy who had done some research years ago that Mr. Lang took an early twin with him to Florida. But now we KNOW for certain that the bike Mr. Lang took to Florida was Lonnie's dad's c1906 single.Be sure to visit;
http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris Haynes View PostI may have missed something. How do we know this for certain? I thought that bike was bought in to a FL swap meet by somebody who brought it in from another state. Color me confused.
Comment
-
O.K. I'm leaning toward thinking that this '09 is sitting in the wrong frame. If my memory serves me right the '09 had a wheelbase of 60 inches and was shortened again in '10 and maybe even again in '11 ??? Just a thought..... There are a few more differences but I'm not sure if there is just some artistic discrepancies between the drawing and the actual machine in the museum. The pic from the '09 New York show is the only one I have from the day and it's partially blocked by a single. So I haven't been able to deduce anything from it.
Chris, somewhere (possibly in this thread) there are a few clues on the origins of Lonnie Sr.'s machine. But jurassic has me wondering about the proto-type now!!! I can't wait to read the findings on this subject!!Cory Othen
Membership#10953
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris Haynes View PostI may have missed something. How do we know this for certain? I thought that bike was bought in to a FL swap meet by somebody who brought it in from another state. Color me confused.Last edited by HarleyCreation; 09-07-2009, 12:51 PM.
Comment
Comment