In regard to Carl and Matt deriving a personal or professional benefit from Matt's position, I would like to point out that Carl's reputation as a first-class restoration artisan is well-established and the quality of his work speaks for itself. If you've ever seen any of his and Matt's restorations on their website or particularly in person, you can see that there is nothing professionally to be gained by Matt being involved with the AMCA. Whether you agree that Matt has received the proper support or not from the AMCA, the purpose of his position as Youth Coordinator is to promote, as a young person, this hobby of ours to those who never had one of these old bikes in their youth as many of us have. After all, who will keep these beasts running when we are dead and gone if not today's youth?
Please note that Carl has never restored any of my bikes, I have never sold him any parts nor have I bought any parts from him, so I have no vested interest in anything but the truth. And no, he has not sent me $30.
Back on topic...
I can personally respect the position of anyone of us who feels that the magazine in and of itself and the contacts it allows us to make with our brethern is worth the $30 annual dues. I can also respect the position of those of us who feel totally left in the dark. I learned a long time ago in business that if you can promote and "sell" an idea prior to implementation you will have everyone, if not on-board with the program, at least informed of what is to pass and much more understanding of what is planned. This is where I feel the Board has been slow to understand.
There is an old saying, you can please some of the people all of the time and all the people some of the time but you can never please all the people all of the time. That does not mean that you should not try. Now we understand why organizations and companies have "Directors of Communication"!
Lonnie C. from SC
Please note that Carl has never restored any of my bikes, I have never sold him any parts nor have I bought any parts from him, so I have no vested interest in anything but the truth. And no, he has not sent me $30.
Back on topic...
I can personally respect the position of anyone of us who feels that the magazine in and of itself and the contacts it allows us to make with our brethern is worth the $30 annual dues. I can also respect the position of those of us who feel totally left in the dark. I learned a long time ago in business that if you can promote and "sell" an idea prior to implementation you will have everyone, if not on-board with the program, at least informed of what is to pass and much more understanding of what is planned. This is where I feel the Board has been slow to understand.
There is an old saying, you can please some of the people all of the time and all the people some of the time but you can never please all the people all of the time. That does not mean that you should not try. Now we understand why organizations and companies have "Directors of Communication"!
Lonnie C. from SC
Comment