Originally posted by Carl Olsen
View Post
Of course I know where we all get our information.
Its just as judges get it for Horex, Bultaco, or Allstate machines, I presume. Right?
How many expert judges are at each Meet for each forgotten marque?
When judges depend upon memory, casual consensus (like a coffeetable book), legend, anecdote, and hearsay,..
that's "Lore", not "Data".
(Think 'Second Generation Star-Trek', I think.)
And please refrain from putting words in my mouth. (Sarge has tread in there enough already.)
I said nothing about "taking a pile of parts and making a factory correct bike out of it"
They are ALL piles o' parts!
Until AMCA judging divorces trophy mentality,
the judging system will continue to lose credibility, and eventually all legitimacy, if it hasn't already.
Consider if you had a historical home,
wouldn't want it on a roster of historical places?
It would document your piece of History, aid its preservation, and validate some of your prolonged investment as well.
Please show me where we can research the machines the AMCA has judged over the decades?
And I don't mean the trophy results, and I don't mean their lists of "faults".
I mean the valuable information ignored by the system, as if the judges were omniscient, and the next owner of a similar machine must start blind to previous discovery, or the game doesn't work.
With today's pixel power, there is no excuse for failing to study each machine in depth for future review,.. and make it available for the good of vintage motorcycling.
As it is, the system is a pox.
It would take the greasy smile of a diplomat to get this ship off the rocks, and coursing for the next half-century;
'Tis thee, Uncle Carl, 'tis thee.
....Cotten
#776
Comment