This is two questions mixed into one. Hopefully it will make sense...
Trying to figure out the correct seat T bar....have three. Two are marked XE 39 on top. One the underside one has the number 10 plus some other type of casting? mark. The second is also marked with the XE 39 On the underside it has a 6 or 9 depending on which way you hold it plus the same type of casting mark. These two have the dog leg that Palmers talks about, the oval shaped slot and measure at 1-13/32 so I believe either will work for the 49. (Only included a pic of one to save space). Do the numbers 10 and 6/9 have any significance?
The second T bar has the numbers 51912-35 on top, nothing on the underside, no dog leg and definitely no oval slot. It too measures 1-13/32. This came off my 65. Palmers talks about changes made in late 60s and the fact that the Ts were not oval shaped as well as the the width (went to 1-29/32). This one is definitely not oval and definitely does not measure out at 1-29/32. Is this one correct for the 65?
Trying to figure out the correct seat T bar....have three. Two are marked XE 39 on top. One the underside one has the number 10 plus some other type of casting? mark. The second is also marked with the XE 39 On the underside it has a 6 or 9 depending on which way you hold it plus the same type of casting mark. These two have the dog leg that Palmers talks about, the oval shaped slot and measure at 1-13/32 so I believe either will work for the 49. (Only included a pic of one to save space). Do the numbers 10 and 6/9 have any significance?
The second T bar has the numbers 51912-35 on top, nothing on the underside, no dog leg and definitely no oval slot. It too measures 1-13/32. This came off my 65. Palmers talks about changes made in late 60s and the fact that the Ts were not oval shaped as well as the the width (went to 1-29/32). This one is definitely not oval and definitely does not measure out at 1-29/32. Is this one correct for the 65?
Comment