Bob,
I can only assume on my statement I'm going to make because I wasn't there in manufacturing...
So here goes based on my years around the Industry. Engineering would have been developing the evolution series engine early on in the 80's. That engine package as we know uses very different valve train including the lifters.
Contracts with suppliers would have been phasing out the Panhead/shovelhead series hydraulic lifter and order volume concentrated on the new evolution series hydraulic lifter for production runs...
This "can" typically constitute a vendor/supplier change hence the -53A in the part number.
This is an assumption on my part coming from Industry involvement knowledge for what it is worth...
Hope this helps,
Duke Kleman
I can only assume on my statement I'm going to make because I wasn't there in manufacturing...
So here goes based on my years around the Industry. Engineering would have been developing the evolution series engine early on in the 80's. That engine package as we know uses very different valve train including the lifters.
Contracts with suppliers would have been phasing out the Panhead/shovelhead series hydraulic lifter and order volume concentrated on the new evolution series hydraulic lifter for production runs...
This "can" typically constitute a vendor/supplier change hence the -53A in the part number.
This is an assumption on my part coming from Industry involvement knowledge for what it is worth...
Hope this helps,
Duke Kleman
Comment