I'm a firm believer that everything on a bike must work as designed or better. All my current bikes are 100% functional as will be anything I have in the future. I've seen to many nice (dare I say Winner Circle) bikes that half the stuff on them were not functional. I think the judging should go back to having to ride the bikes for a few miles before they are judged, boy wouldn't that shake up the judging.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1947 FL Question
Collapse
X
-
Louie
FaceBook >>>Modern Antique Cycle
Blog Site >>> http://louiemcman.blogspot.com/
YouTube >>> LouieMCman
-
Louie,
I read your post about combining the knucklehead and Indian.... it jogged my memory and I called a friend this afternoon who had done something similar in the late '60s. He grafted the rear section of the Indian plunger frame on the Harley straightleg frame but left the front frame section all Harley except that he grafted the Indian neck on the frame and ran the post war chief girder which he liked better than the Harley springer. Unfortunately he never took any pictures of it but I would think it would be similar to the pic posted earlier in this thread. As far as the rear wheel goes, my friend said that he used a Harley rear wheel to go with the Harley transmission and all he ended up doing was making a spacer or spacers to run the Harley hub in the slightly wider Indian rear frame. Anyhow, good luck.
MikeMike Carver
AMCA #3349
Comment
-
Originally posted by mcarver View PostLouie,
I read your post about combining the knucklehead and Indian.... it jogged my memory and I called a friend this afternoon who had done something similar in the late '60s. He grafted the rear section of the Indian plunger frame on the Harley straightleg frame but left the front frame section all Harley except that he grafted the Indian neck on the frame and ran the post war chief girder which he liked better than the Harley springer. Unfortunately he never took any pictures of it but I would think it would be similar to the pic posted earlier in this thread. As far as the rear wheel goes, my friend said that he used a Harley rear wheel to go with the Harley transmission and all he ended up doing was making a spacer or spacers to run the Harley hub in the slightly wider Indian rear frame. Anyhow, good luck.
MikeLouie
FaceBook >>>Modern Antique Cycle
Blog Site >>> http://louiemcman.blogspot.com/
YouTube >>> LouieMCman
Comment
-
Originally posted by knuckleheadtim View PostThis was the last Knuckle built (until someone proves otherwise)!!!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10249[/ATTACH]Be sure to visit;
http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/
Comment
-
This conjures up images of the knuckle I saw in Daytona a few years ago that had an Indian transmission.....Lonnie Campbell #9908
South Cackalackey, U.S. of A.
Come see us at the Tenth Annual AMCA Southern National Meet - May 17-19, 2019 at Denton FarmPark, Denton, N.C.
Visit the website for vendor and visitor information at www.amcasouthernnationalmeet.com
Comment
-
To my way of thinking, the Harley Knuckle is the best looking motorcycle engine ever. Likewise, the late (1945-48) Indian girder fork is the most attractive motorcycle fork ever made. You might end up with a good-looking bike. We would all love to see pictures when you are done.George Tinkham
Springfield, IL
www.virmc.com
AMCA # 1494
1941 Indian 841
1948 Indian Chief
1956 H-D KHK
1960 CH
1964 BMW R69S
1966 Honda Touring Benly (aka "150 Dream")
1984 Moto Guzzi V65Sp
Comment
-
Best looking Harley? Any Knucklehead. Best looking Indian? Any Four. Between both companies? 38-39 Four or 36 Knuckle? I can't pick one. Can you?? Let the battle begin. LOLLast edited by D.A.Bagin; 03-17-2013, 05:48 PM.D. A. Bagin #3166 AKA Panheadzz 440 48chief W/sidecar 57fl 57flh 58fl 66m-50 68flh 70xlh
Comment
Comment