Thanks for that Panhead, so you saying my frame is 1942, the same as the engine, this seems to contradict Steve Slocombe who says its a 1943. Do you have any official evidence of frame numbers, because I may need it to register the bike here in France.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
42wlc
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ross View PostJust one more comment on should you restore pre 4800 or post 10,000 The main issue in my humble opinion is that the first 5 symbols tell the tale from a Canadian perspective. 42WLC.... is what determines whether you go 1942 resto or 1943 resto in Canadian military trim. So I hark back to my first post, I think there is no option but to do a 1942 style WLC military look.If your bike was a WLA...different story.Ross
Comment
-
The regs in the UK normally go on the frame number, the problem there is that there are hundreds of WLA and C's with the frame number ZE-35T! I have the original buff log book that has that number. I think that I will restore it as a 42, because of the early crank case number and also because it has the high level head light fitted and the rear mud guard is an early one, although it does have the original 'Fred Warr' valances on. I noticed that a lot of C's had frame numbers stamped by the Canadians, just under the saddle. I could always stamp the engine number there and that should satisfy the French authorities.
Comment
-
As of yet the AMCA is not checking die numbers. I do not think it will ever happen except maybe to bikes judged as original paint. Jerry
Originally posted by Steve Slocombe View PostThat would be my call too, and no need to panic as I said in my earlier post. Are the AMCA judges even checking die numbers yet when judging WW2 bikes? I'm not sure I would want them to.
Comment
Comment