From reading the reactions to the recent modifications to the judging system, it has become apparent that a large percentage of our members are unhappy with the changes. My Dad and I have participated in judging at various meets for years, and it upsets me that both he and I have suggested that maybe we will sit out the judging at Oley this year. It's not that our bikes will no longer qualify....we both ride 98+ point original paint bikes with nothing to hide. The reason is that it just doesn't seem fun anymore. We both have our bikes judged for no other reason than enjoyment. The enjoyment of taking our vintage bikes out for a nice ride (we always ride them to the meets), having people appreciate them on the judging field, and have expert judges tell us what we can do to make them more correct.
Judging under Kevin & Robin was always an enjoyable experience. In fact, after our bikes made winners circle, one time at Jefferson Kevin even made sure that our bikes were checked at the beginning of the pack so that we could be on the road in time to make the 3.5 hour trip home before it got dark. I'm sure there are hundreds of other members with similar stories. But now it sounds like things are starting to change.
If the AMCA wants to make the national awards more prestigious, why not just add another level of award rather than tamper with a system that most members seemed to be happy with. Rather than make it more difficult and unpleasant to reach winner's circle, wouldn't it make more sense to add a new level of national award beyond it? All other regulations regarding Junior, Senior, and Winner's Circle could have remained the same, but people with bikes that they feel are the "pride of the AMCA" or "concourse correct" would be able to continue the process to another step. This new award could represent what the AMCA is trying to turn winner's circle in to with recent changes.
The AMCA could make the new national award as difficult to achieve as they want. The minimum number of points needed to qualify could be raised to 98. All repro parts could be cause for DQ from this category. Whatever you want really, because it's a new award and people can pursue it if they WANT, or just be content with the old awards they already earned.
Judging should be as inclusive as possible. My guess is that judging is what has drawn a lot of our members to the club. Imagine spending years restoring a bike only to find out that it is can never get above the junior level because of a repop frame? Or even worse....imagine the person with a bike that they bought new only to see it get DQ'd because of a legitimate engine case replacement done by the factory during it's functional life?
The members are speaking and they are not happy. There is still time to fix this situation. My suggestion is just and idea, but I'm sure if the club works together we can come up with something that will be better for the good of ALL members of the club.
Judging under Kevin & Robin was always an enjoyable experience. In fact, after our bikes made winners circle, one time at Jefferson Kevin even made sure that our bikes were checked at the beginning of the pack so that we could be on the road in time to make the 3.5 hour trip home before it got dark. I'm sure there are hundreds of other members with similar stories. But now it sounds like things are starting to change.
If the AMCA wants to make the national awards more prestigious, why not just add another level of award rather than tamper with a system that most members seemed to be happy with. Rather than make it more difficult and unpleasant to reach winner's circle, wouldn't it make more sense to add a new level of national award beyond it? All other regulations regarding Junior, Senior, and Winner's Circle could have remained the same, but people with bikes that they feel are the "pride of the AMCA" or "concourse correct" would be able to continue the process to another step. This new award could represent what the AMCA is trying to turn winner's circle in to with recent changes.
The AMCA could make the new national award as difficult to achieve as they want. The minimum number of points needed to qualify could be raised to 98. All repro parts could be cause for DQ from this category. Whatever you want really, because it's a new award and people can pursue it if they WANT, or just be content with the old awards they already earned.
Judging should be as inclusive as possible. My guess is that judging is what has drawn a lot of our members to the club. Imagine spending years restoring a bike only to find out that it is can never get above the junior level because of a repop frame? Or even worse....imagine the person with a bike that they bought new only to see it get DQ'd because of a legitimate engine case replacement done by the factory during it's functional life?
The members are speaking and they are not happy. There is still time to fix this situation. My suggestion is just and idea, but I'm sure if the club works together we can come up with something that will be better for the good of ALL members of the club.
Comment