The longest distance riders TO Wauseon did not get the awards AT Wauseon.
When did the rules change?
I thought that your mileage ridden to the meet (on a bike 35 years old or older) counted as mileage for the "Longest Distance" ridden awards. Not anymore I guess. The rules were changed at Wauseon.
Now it only matters how far away your house is. Not the actual miles ridden to the meet. So, the awards were given out based on the distance to your home.
In my case, I rode along the great shoreline roads of lake Michigan (more than 800 miles of fantastic riding) to the meet. It was "judged" however, that I should have ridden a shorter route from my home on the interstate highways. Therefore, my mileage did not count.
What gives? How does this new rule promote ridership? Does everyone now have to have their itinerary pre-approved before heading out to the national meets?
Why can't we just keep the old rule: mileage ridden to the meet is mileage ridden to the meet.
IRon
When did the rules change?
I thought that your mileage ridden to the meet (on a bike 35 years old or older) counted as mileage for the "Longest Distance" ridden awards. Not anymore I guess. The rules were changed at Wauseon.
Now it only matters how far away your house is. Not the actual miles ridden to the meet. So, the awards were given out based on the distance to your home.
In my case, I rode along the great shoreline roads of lake Michigan (more than 800 miles of fantastic riding) to the meet. It was "judged" however, that I should have ridden a shorter route from my home on the interstate highways. Therefore, my mileage did not count.
What gives? How does this new rule promote ridership? Does everyone now have to have their itinerary pre-approved before heading out to the national meets?
Why can't we just keep the old rule: mileage ridden to the meet is mileage ridden to the meet.
IRon
Comment