Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1962 Pan VIN

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by chuckthebeatertruck View Post

    I have seen this “light strike” 6 on less than half a dozen sportsters. Only on the starting 6. First time I saw it I thought replacement cases but that was true in only one instance.

    I have it on good authority a minimum 5 pound hammer is needed, and just being a bit too soft results in a poor transfer.
    Chuck I've seen the light strike 6 before also and just assumed that it was a tandem stamp that was machined off.

    Jerry

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Jerry Wieland View Post

      Cotten Muriatic Acid

      Jerry
      That's easy enough, Jerry, Thanks!

      It would highlight different alloys introduced from welding, no doubt,..

      But could it show shadows of previous stampings, like nitric on steel when they have been ground off a gun (or oh yeah,... a frame)?

      Wish I had time to try, but Davenport is looming over me like a storm.

      ....Cotten


      AMCA #776
      Dumpster Diver's Motto: Seek,... and Ye Shall Find!

      Comment


      • #18
        Thanks for all the detailed responses. Great to learn from you guys!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by BigLakeBob View Post
          Eric, I'm not into serial #'s like you are and maybe I don't understand what you call a serif. Both my 2's have an upward 'hook' on the bottom leg of the 2. In your post #8 pictures 2 & 3 I do not know why you say the sequence 2 is seriffed. What do you call a serif on a 2? Please educate. I see the 2's are a different style in your 4th pic but both have a serif, I'll look again when I get time. Thanks, Bob

          Cheers Bob. When you said serif you were referring to the same thing that I was referring to. Some 2s have a vertical serif (upward ‘hook’) at bottom right while some other 2s are sans serif.

          But at post #8 for my second picture I didn’t mention a serif. Instead I referred to the 6 in the sequence portion: ‘In the sequence portion, regardless of how low or high the SN is, the 6 has a straight back.’
          Here’s my second picture again.






          For my third picture I said the sequence 2 is seriffed because it is: ‘In the sequence portion, regardless of how low or high the SN is, the 2 is seriffed.’
          Here’s my third picture again and the sequence 2 is seriffed. But the year 2 is sans serif and apparently this was normal procedure at the factory.







          However, in the year portion the round-back 6 and sans serif 2 were later changed to a straight-back 6 and a seriffed 2 which is what you have. But even though the year 2 was changed to a seriffed style, it was different overall to the sequence 2 as per my fourth picture. And if both your 2s have a serif, but are different to each other overall, then that is what I’d expect.

          Eric

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Speeding Big Twin View Post


            Cheers Bob. When you said serif you were referring to the same thing that I was referring to. Some 2s have a vertical serif (upward ‘hook’) at bottom right while some other 2s are sans serif.

            But at post #8 for my second picture I didn’t mention a serif. Instead I referred to the 6 in the sequence portion: ‘In the sequence portion, regardless of how low or high the SN is, the 6 has a straight back.’
            Here’s my second picture again.






            For my third picture I said the sequence 2 is seriffed because it is: ‘In the sequence portion, regardless of how low or high the SN is, the 2 is seriffed.’
            Here’s my third picture again and the sequence 2 is seriffed. But the year 2 is sans serif and apparently this was normal procedure at the factory.







            However, in the year portion the round-back 6 and sans serif 2 were later changed to a straight-back 6 and a seriffed 2 which is what you have. But even though the year 2 was changed to a seriffed style, it was different overall to the sequence 2 as per my fourth picture. And if both your 2s have a serif, but are different to each other overall, then that is what I’d expect.

            Eric
            I think the round back 6 is part of a tandem stamp. Jerry

            Comment


            • #21
              Eric, Both of my 2's on a 12000+ serial # have serifs on the bottom leg, but are of a different style per your example.
              Bob Rice #6738

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by BigLakeBob View Post
                Eric, Both of my 2's on a 12000+ serial # have serifs on the bottom leg, but are of a different style per your example.
                Thanks Bob. Those things are consistent with factory stamping for later-62s.
                Eric

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Jerry Wieland View Post

                  I think the round back 6 is part of a tandem stamp. Jerry
                  I agree. Here’s part of what I said in my first post: ‘The early-62 characters normally look like they were done with a tandem stamp …’
                  Eric

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X