I want to comment on two items which impressed me by their contrast in out latest magazine. The "Shame on Who" letter really up-set me. The legend of the motorcycle show from Half Moon Bay, while stellar in the quality and variety of motorcycles in attendance displays a distressing trend to gentrify our great hobby and turn it into the elitist pursuit of the wine and cheese set, or should I say the cognac and fat cigar set. $65 entrance fees certainly keep the riff-raff out but 20 + years ago, that was who owned many of the those bikes. The letter writer goes on to cast shame on out editor which is a direct slap in the face of every member of the AMCA, but I'll not put into words what I think of the letter writer.
The contrast I find compelling is the article about Kim Healy's '46 WL. She is symbolic of the members who do their own work and struggle with all the aspects of restoration while trying to fund a project on a finite budget. I have nothing but admiration for a member like Kim becuase unlike the rich jerk who pays someone else to get their hands dirty, she is discovering the intangible treasure of taking a pile of junk, putting the essence of your skill, determination, and sweat into the project and completing something you can truly be proud of. I'd walk past 25 Crockers to admire her efforts on that well done 45.
The contrast I find compelling is the article about Kim Healy's '46 WL. She is symbolic of the members who do their own work and struggle with all the aspects of restoration while trying to fund a project on a finite budget. I have nothing but admiration for a member like Kim becuase unlike the rich jerk who pays someone else to get their hands dirty, she is discovering the intangible treasure of taking a pile of junk, putting the essence of your skill, determination, and sweat into the project and completing something you can truly be proud of. I'd walk past 25 Crockers to admire her efforts on that well done 45.
Comment