old photos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • INLINE4NUT
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2004
    • 983

    #436
    Baytown, ThankYou!

    Comment

    • William McClean
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 153

      #437
      I like the shiny nickel poop deflecter on the rear fender of the Big X.

      What is that thing ? An experimental air foil ?

      Can anybody find a listing as a period excessory ? A reflector maybe ?
      William McClean
      AMCA # 60

      Comment

      • exeric
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2005
        • 5960

        #438
        Are you referring to the license plate ?
        Eric Smith
        AMCA #886

        Comment

        • Rubone
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2004
          • 4764

          #439
          Looks like an old porcelain license plate to me!
          Robbie
          Robbie Knight Amca #2736

          Comment

          • Chris Haynes
            Curmudgeon
            • Jul 2002
            • 5939

            #440
            Originally posted by William McClean View Post
            I like the shiny nickel poop deflecter on the rear fender of the Big X.

            What is that thing ? An experimental air foil ?

            Can anybody find a listing as a period excessory ? A reflector maybe ?
            Ya mean the licence plate?
            Be sure to visit;
            http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
            Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
            Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/

            Comment

            • William McClean
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2008
              • 153

              #441
              I may just be the angel of the photo.

              verticle mount, beveled at top and bottom, Ridge running verticle, with a depth of about 1.5 ", standing off the fender. No visable ## s
              William McClean
              AMCA # 60

              Comment

              • Rubone
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2004
                • 4764

                #442
                Sorry William, but I just don't see it. No bevel, it just looks dirty or chipped, the contour follows all the way to the end. No ridge that I see, just looks rounded to me, which also gives the illusion of depth. Not standing off, just a shadow line along the edge. As far as numbers, it would be hard to see them if the colors were not very drastically different.
                That's all I get out of it!
                Oh, and no Angels in the photo that I see!
                Robbie
                Robbie Knight Amca #2736

                Comment

                • exeric
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 5960

                  #443
                  Speaking of that Excelsior. Would anyone care to guess the year, and what features make it that year ?
                  Eric Smith
                  AMCA #886

                  Comment

                  • William McClean
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 153

                    #444
                    It IS probably time for me to get new glasses, but I sure do see that as 3 dimensional piece, curved and raised in the middle { only seeing the near side of course } bevels at top and bottom for mounting, rounded at the bottom and top, not a rectangular outer shape.

                    Maybe what I see as the top of the ridge { center line } is the far side of a flat piece. Still no ## though.

                    The Angels could have helped with my spelling check.
                    William McClean
                    AMCA # 60

                    Comment

                    • Scott Parker
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2006
                      • 214

                      #445
                      ready to roar 1912

                      Comment

                      • bmh
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 901

                        #446
                        All right Eric, I'll bite. Don't know much about Excelsiors, but based on the tank I'd say it was later....22-24?? Any one else?
                        Brian Howard AMCA#5866

                        Comment

                        • Tommo
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2001
                          • 1318

                          #447
                          I'll bite too but like Brian I don't know Excelsiors. How about 1915.
                          Peter Thomson, a.k.a. Tommo
                          A.M.C.A. # 2777
                          Palmerston North, New Zealand.

                          Comment

                          • c.o.
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 5353

                            #448
                            I'm with Tommo on this one. I too am no expert on Excelsiors but something about that primary points me in the direction of 1915.
                            Cory Othen
                            Membership#10953

                            Comment

                            • exeric
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 5960

                              #449
                              1915 is correct. Standout features of a '15 Big X are the exposed Eclipse clutch, and the right side shift handle. I was thinking today, how unique the 1915 Harleys, Indians, and Excelsiors were. They were like nothing before or after which had to be quite an expensive model year for those companies. H-D and Excelsior had major frame changes along with the introduction of a 3 speed transmission. One year later in 1916, Indian introduced the PowerPlus motor, H-D streamlined their tanks and fenders, and Excelsior made engineering changes to much of the Big X. 1915 and 1916 must have been wildly hectic in the engineering departments of those companies.
                              Eric Smith
                              AMCA #886

                              Comment

                              • Scott Parker
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2006
                                • 214

                                #450
                                early merkel

                                Comment

                                Working...