i think the bike in the back ground got a little curb appeal. the fork looks pushed back a bit
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
old photos
Collapse
X
-
-
I bet the bike in the back is not even rideable. Looks like the fender is so far into the frame that you wouldn't be able to turn the fork. Those are pretty neat forks with sprung suspension.
Comment
-
While searching for some info this popped up... http://www.indianmotorcycle.com/en-u...os-hist-images
Just looking at that Singer photo again.... I've been searching for info but it's been futile so far. That's a cool image Jurassic.... hopefully something will surface...Cory Othen
Membership#10953
Comment
-
Very nice Jurassic - thanks for posting!
Yes, gotta wonder about the bike in the back. Would like to see the full photo. Women on motorcycles is an interest of mine. Very curious about all the gear they had to wear. That photo looks like it would be good even just to show two women in period garb for riding. Want to think that the bike was rideable, but probably not. At minimum that fender was rubbing against the down tube. But if you were simply running straight lines through road ruts just to get to the general store it might not have been an issue? I'm sure they weren't hanging into turns much back then.Last edited by rbenash; 05-22-2013, 07:48 AM.Ray
AMCA #7140
Comment
-
Here's the whole photoOriginally posted by jurassic View PostI found this photo many years ago, and still have not been able to find out any information on this bike or the company that may have built it. Is it a rebadged bike? Does it have any relation to the sewing machine company? In what city was is manufactured?
Comment
-
You nailed it Tom! Anyone decipher the writing on the tank?
I hear you on that fender Eric. It does seem a little lengthy don't it? I'm sure it may have made sense at the time but I could just imagine running that machine on a muddy road comprised of primarily clay. I'm thinkin' that could have been a real pain.Cory Othen
Membership#10953
Comment
Comment