49 el

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • t-bone
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 76

    #1

    49 el

    hello everyone, I,m a new member I found a 49el a whileback that had been sitting since late 60s .I,m 2nd owner it is original paint congo green but it has hydraglide on upper fork cover and cigar muffler. low miles vin#49el64** the older gent i bought it from swears it came from dealer like it is it came with original key and keychain with 48 wheatpenny inside small horseshoe shaped medallion from local dealer Ive been told muffler and cover are incorrect.not changing them just curious thanks t-b
  • exeric
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2005
    • 5962

    #2
    '49 is a great year. Can you post some pictures. By the way, where did you come up with t-bone?
    Eric Smith
    AMCA #886

    Comment

    • t-bone
      Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 76

      #3
      49el

      I'll try to post pics in near future. not because to busy just not real handy on confusers yet. as for name got tagged with it in grammer school more years ago than i want to think about.

      Comment

      • T. Cotten
        Gadfly from the Dumpster
        • Jun 2001
        • 8213

        #4
        I recently opened a fossil tin of Congo Green, and to my shock (and another present) it was fresh as the day it was made. Such a smell! Only a thumbprint came out of it.

        So what's the point?
        None.
        Since modern paints cannot match it, ever.

        Please preserve your original paint machine! The finish, no matter what the condition, is rare and impossible to reproduce.
        Beware that any exposure to digestive modern fuels may endanger it.

        ....Cotten
        PS: My modern "Burgundy" '49 looks suspiciously like "Indian Red".
        AMCA #776
        Dumpster Diver's Motto: Seek,... and Ye Shall Find!

        Comment

        • bmh
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2007
          • 901

          #5
          The muffler is definetly incorrect, should be a rocket fin or "Flash Gordon" type. Here's some pics of an original 49. ser #49FL95XX. It has the optional 49 only chrome muffler cover ( the chrome is really, really gone so it's hard to see). It also has a Hydra-Glide labeled fork tin but as you can see in the photo the patina on the front tin does not match that of the top clamp cover or tube covers, it is too shiny compared to the others. I believe it to be a replacement as most likely is yours. The rest of the machine appears to be very authentic.
          Attached Files
          Brian Howard AMCA#5866

          Comment

          • c.o.
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2003
            • 5353

            #6
            That's one sweet pan Brian!!!
            Cory Othen
            Membership#10953

            Comment

            • jwl
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2001
              • 338

              #7
              bmh, According to the 49 order blank the muffler cover was stainless steel, not chrome. Are you sure yours was chromed?

              Comment

              • t-bone
                Member
                • Sep 2008
                • 76

                #8
                thanks for the info . I,m not restoring just preserving nice old window to the past thanks again t-b

                Comment

                • bmh
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 901

                  #9
                  Went back and checked the order blank and you are correct, it lists stainless. Unfortunatley this one is not mine, it turned up for judging this year at Rhinebeck and since we found it interesting we took quite a few pics of it. Here are some better ones of the muffler cover. It appears to have been plated or perhaps even painted at one time as you can see patches of it left. I've never seen stainless discolor this bad so I'm not sure if it is or not. Look at the pic and tell me what you think.
                  Attached Files
                  Brian Howard AMCA#5866

                  Comment

                  • Chris Haynes
                    Curmudgeon
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 5939

                    #10
                    Ive been told muffler and cover are incorrect.not changing them just curious thanks t-b[/QUOTE]

                    The cover could be correct as they were phased in during the 1949 model year.
                    The muffler is another story. Is it a Harley-Davidson muffler or an aftermarket accessory? H-D mufflers are marked H-D with the part number on the back side. It was not unusual for dealers to put accessories on new bikes.
                    Be sure to visit;
                    http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
                    Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
                    Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/

                    Comment

                    • jwl
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2001
                      • 338

                      #11
                      The cover's shape looks correct but it surely doesn't look stainless. I wouldn't be able to make a judgement from the small pictures. Interesting bike, nonetheless.

                      Comment

                      • t-bone
                        Member
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 76

                        #12
                        Thanks again everyone. Pulled muffler off this morning, no stamp. no welded seam. Must be period accessory. On other note, primary inspection cover screws are at 6 & 12 instead of 3 & 9. But primary cover patina or rust as you may identical to inner primary. Trying to send pictures of bike after cleaning up.

                        Bmh, Will send you Cd of pre clean up Pics. If you tell me where to send.

                        PS. Hey chris met you last year at elcamino or long beach swap meets, with Jed from Phoenix.
                        Last edited by t-bone; 09-29-2008, 11:22 AM.

                        Comment

                        • Chris Haynes
                          Curmudgeon
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 5939

                          #13
                          As you can see in this photo the factory photos of the 1949 are actually that of a 1948 machine. The 1950 photos show the 6/12 position and I am sure it is correct for your mid production 1949,
                          Be sure to visit;
                          http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
                          Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
                          Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/

                          Comment

                          • t-bone
                            Member
                            • Sep 2008
                            • 76

                            #14
                            test pic

                            Comment

                            • t-bone
                              Member
                              • Sep 2008
                              • 76

                              #15
                              pic 2

                              Comment

                              Working...