Springer fork - rear lower legs.

[Jerry Wieland]

Is anybody making the lower rear legs for a 1936 and up springer frontend.

Jerry

[Chris Haynes]

Lower rear legs, front and rear fork. Talk about confusing.

[Jerry Wieland]

Lower rear legs, front and rear fork. Talk about confusing.

So Chris, is that a yes or a no?

[len dowe]

Jerry,
Did you Cass Kuzba? He might know.

[Chris Haynes]

So Chris, is that a yes or a no?

Your question is thourghly confusing. I have no idea what you want. "Lower rear legs, front and rear fork." Lower rear legs for front fork?

[harleytoprock]

He wants the legs for the rigid fork. That would be the lower legs of the rear fork on the front end.

[shelbyinparadise]

Is anybody making the lower rear legs for a 1936 and up springer frontend.

Jerry

I do not see where Jerry fell short in his brief Question, Is anybody (person or company) making (producing a replacement for) lower rear legs (the ridged rear fork has a right and left leg) for a 1936 and up springer frontend (Springer fork assembly is commonly called a frontend)?. Only my thoughts that he was asking a serious question. I know the lower legs are being produced for the front Spring fork but not of any for the ridged rear. Spelling and form aside, if a real question is asked, those with knowledge can craft a good faith answer. Shelby

[Chris Haynes]

It is his wording of "Lower rear legs, front and rear fork." But of course he has edited his original post and it doesn't say that anymore.

[shelbyinparadise]

Sorry Chris, did not see the original wording which would explain your post. Shelby

[Sidehacker]

I'm sure it was supposed to say front end rear fork but with spell check you have to be on your game . However some people go out of their way to be well, snotty is such harsh word but I think it would fit real well here. I understood what he wanted without getting all excited that I could be the first to make someone feel smaller for a simple mistake . Of coarse I could be wrong but if you read this forum over a long period of time certain things keep jumping out at you. and it's the same reason I use it less and less . I get a little anxious that I might phrase a question wrong and certain people would go out of their way to not answer the question or ask for it to be clarified but point out the mistake so I look less knowledgeable or maybe just plain stupid. It gets old real fast . I tell my children not to act like this . It's to bad that as adult we have to deal with this nonsense .
If I'm incorrect I apologise that I might have hurt someone's feelings . But if you are a new member or just one that is lacking a little in the proper terminology please don't be intimidated or afraid to ask a question because you don't want the stuff that you don't know to be more important than your question . ( before its pointed out I know I used a double negative in the last sentence)

The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked.
FNA