I'm considering changing gearing to get little more top speed. Right now i am running standard 74 ci solo gearing; 16/43 on the front and 28/44 on the rear; the engine likes to run at road speeds between 35-45 mph. i'd like to be able to run between 45-55 mph if i don't sacrifice too much when taking off from a stop in low gear. If it's a good choice, i'd prefer to change out the engine sprocket instead of the countershaft sprocket. how much difference would going to an 18t or a 17t from a 16t make?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Re: considering changing gearing for a few more mph
Collapse
X
-
Re: considering changing gearing for a few more mph
Steve Swan
27JD 11090 Restored
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClUPIOo7-o8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtuptEAlU30
27JD 13514 aka "Frank"
https://forum.antiquemotorcycle.org/...n-Project-SWAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNRB...nnel=steveswan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSDeuTqD9Ks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwlIsZKmsTYTags: None
-
Dear Steve, it's easy to work out. A 17t sprocket would increase top speed by 17/16 or 6% and 18t likewise by 11%. On the VLs the standard solo drive sprocket was 23t, bizarrely reduced to 22t in 1934 when the more powerful motor came out. I like 25t on the VL drive sprocket, and several of my bikes have the 100 mph gearing with the 27t drive sprocket, which does make them tricky round town. It was dirt roads in the 1920s and 30s, and I think the bikes were undergeared compared with what they will do on our new-fangled paved roads. Check with the Cannonball riders to see what gearing they were using on the JDs, but I'm guessing it was a lot taller than you have at present.
-
For what it's worth I'm running as tall as I believe you can go on a J Model.
18 Motor Sprocket
43 Clutch Sprocket (Thanks Mark Masa!)
28 Countershaft
40 on the Rear Sprocket. I think Slocombe's point regarding dirt roads and resulting slower speeds explains the scarcity of original 40 tooth sprockets floating around at swap meets. Not many were ever in use.
With the large diameter flywheels on a J the taller gearing really doesn't present a problem getting under way from a stop.
Further it gives you more use of Low gear rather than up shifting immediately.
Comment
-
Gentleman, thank you for your replies! And to "sswaney" for listing your sprocket sizes! I am going to start out with going to an 18t engine sprocket, see what happens, and then go from there. Considering the scarcity of rear wheel sprockets smaller than 44t, my going with an 18t engine sprocket might be as good as it gets.Steve Swan
27JD 11090 Restored
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClUPIOo7-o8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtuptEAlU30
27JD 13514 aka "Frank"
https://forum.antiquemotorcycle.org/...n-Project-SWAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNRB...nnel=steveswan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSDeuTqD9Ks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwlIsZKmsTY
Comment
-
Originally posted by sswaney View PostFor what it's worth I'm running as tall as I believe you can go on a J Model.
18 Motor Sprocket
43 Clutch Sprocket (Thanks Mark Masa!)
28 Countershaft
40 on the Rear Sprocket. I think Slocombe's point regarding dirt roads and resulting slower speeds explains the scarcity of original 40 tooth sprockets floating around at swap meets. Not many were ever in use.
With the large diameter flywheels on a J the taller gearing really doesn't present a problem getting under way from a stop.
Further it gives you more use of Low gear rather than up shifting immediately.Steve Swan
27JD 11090 Restored
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClUPIOo7-o8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtuptEAlU30
27JD 13514 aka "Frank"
https://forum.antiquemotorcycle.org/...n-Project-SWAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNRB...nnel=steveswan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSDeuTqD9Ks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwlIsZKmsTY
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve Slocombe View PostDear Steve, it's easy to work out. A 17t sprocket would increase top speed by 17/16 or 6% and 18t likewise by 11%. On the VLs the standard solo drive sprocket was 23t, bizarrely reduced to 22t in 1934 when the more powerful motor came out. I like 25t on the VL drive sprocket, and several of my bikes have the 100 mph gearing with the 27t drive sprocket, which does make them tricky round town. It was dirt roads in the 1920s and 30s, and I think the bikes were undergeared compared with what they will do on our new-fangled paved roads. Check with the Cannonball riders to see what gearing they were using on the JDs, but I'm guessing it was a lot taller than you have at present.Steve Swan
27JD 11090 Restored
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClUPIOo7-o8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtuptEAlU30
27JD 13514 aka "Frank"
https://forum.antiquemotorcycle.org/...n-Project-SWAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNRB...nnel=steveswan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSDeuTqD9Ks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwlIsZKmsTY
Comment
-
To gain higher overall speeds one needs to not only increase gearing,. but also increase the ability to utilize that gearing. Overgearing is one of the most common mistakes made in function of powered vehicles. Often taller gears can result in a reduction in top speed., not a gain, along with increased heat. poor fuel economy, etc. More speed means more power needed., gearing is only a small par of the overall equation. Then there is altitude. What works at Sea Level can fall on its face at 6000 feet. Friction loss increases exponentially at speed.
So don't be fooled by percentages based on pure numbers. That isn't the real world.Robbie Knight Amca #2736
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rubone View PostTo gain higher overall speeds one needs to not only increase gearing,. but also increase the ability to utilize that gearing. Overgearing is one of the most common mistakes made in function of powered vehicles. Often taller gears can result in a reduction in top speed., not a gain, along with increased heat. poor fuel economy, etc. More speed means more power needed., gearing is only a small par of the overall equation. Then there is altitude. What works at Sea Level can fall on its face at 6000 feet. Friction loss increases exponentially at speed.
So don't be fooled by percentages based on pure numbers. That isn't the real world.Steve Swan
27JD 11090 Restored
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClUPIOo7-o8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtuptEAlU30
27JD 13514 aka "Frank"
https://forum.antiquemotorcycle.org/...n-Project-SWAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNRB...nnel=steveswan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSDeuTqD9Ks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwlIsZKmsTY
Comment
-
I can comfortably run 50-55 without pushing it and have run those speeds consistently all day.
When I first got the bike up and started running it I thought, this thing will never hold together at these speeds.
No issues and the motor seems to like it. I have ran it much harder for streches without a problem but it seems comfortable at those speeds. 80 MPH once on the 2011 Sandhills Road Ride where there was enough road to get it there. I am running a slightly upgraded inlet setup. JDH inlet rockers, which I believe are the same lift ratio as a JD, but I'm only running the outer spring not the inner so my inlet valve spring pressure is greater than a J but less than JDH. I was concerned both springs would put too much stress on the lifter arm rollers. 15/16" venturi in a Schebler DLX45.
When I first started building my first J, all my AMCA riding buddies wanted to know why I was wasting my time on something I couldn't ride on our Chapter road rides. After seeing what a J model can do I would describe their responces as shocked and surprised.
Comment
Comment