Well I did it - bought another one.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jerry Wieland
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2006
    • 2013

    #1

    Well I did it - bought another one.

    I believe it is a 1923 by the number near the seatpost. I also got the transmission for it but nothing else. Came from a friend who got it out of a shed in southern Minnesota.
    Attached Files
  • gww
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 143

    #2
    looks like a great foundation. you guys good we hope.
    gww57.com

    Comment

    • MMasa
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2001
      • 1192

      #3
      Jerry
      Looks like a 23 rear fender to me. With that wide fork and front fender the engine should be a 74" and NOT a 61" unless you're just building a rider.
      Everything looks to be in really solid condition. Good score.
      Mark
      Mark Masa
      www.linkcycles.com

      Comment

      • Jerry Wieland
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2006
        • 2013

        #4
        Yes Gary - Debi and I are good. Hope the best for you and Linda too. We are going to be on the Colorado Road Run in June out of Blackhawk. You going to be around?

        Jerry

        Originally posted by gww View Post
        looks like a great foundation. you guys good we hope.

        Comment

        • Jerry Wieland
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2006
          • 2013

          #5
          Mark I was wondering about that wide frontend. I was thinking that maybe it was just a later front but everything looks so undisturbed. I do not see a restoration out of it but Cannonball did cross my mind. I would be looking for an engine if one was out there.

          Jerry


          Originally posted by MMasa View Post
          Jerry
          Looks like a 23 rear fender to me. With that wide fork and front fender the engine should be a 74" and NOT a 61" unless you're just building a rider.
          Everything looks to be in really solid condition. Good score.
          Mark

          Comment

          • MMasa
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2001
            • 1192

            #6
            Jerry
            In 1922 and 1923, the 74" used the wide fork and front fender without divots in the valence while the 61" used the earlier -16 rear leg and a wide fender with divots in the valences to fit the narrow fork.
            Sent u a PM.
            Mark
            Mark Masa
            www.linkcycles.com

            Comment

            • gww
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 143

              #7
              we will be there. look n forward to catch n up.
              gww57.com

              Comment

              • Steve Swan
                Possessed by Motorcycles
                • Aug 2013
                • 1589

                #8
                wow, that chassis looks to be a beauty !
                Steve Swan

                27JD 11090 Restored
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClUPIOo7-o8
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtuptEAlU30

                27JD 13514 aka "Frank"
                https://forum.antiquemotorcycle.org/...n-Project-SWAN
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNRB...nnel=steveswan

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSDeuTqD9Ks
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwlIsZKmsTY

                Comment

                • Jerry Wieland
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 2013

                  #9
                  Yeah Steve it looks real solid. With any luck the frame won't need anywhere near the work my last Cannonball bike did.

                  Originally posted by Steve Swan View Post
                  wow, that chassis looks to be a beauty !

                  Comment

                  • Jerry Wieland
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 2013

                    #10
                    Mark This is a picture of what I have. I need everything else. Does the number on the frame correspond in any way to the serial number that would have been on the engine? Jerry
                    Attached Files

                    Comment

                    • MMasa
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2001
                      • 1192

                      #11
                      Ok Jerry, know what you need now.
                      If you are going for correctness and your frame is marked 23F xxxx, then the trans should have a letter L and while the serial numbers between the engine, frame, and transmission do not match, they tend to be somewhat close. In the neighborhood of within 100 to 500 of each other.
                      Mark
                      Mark Masa
                      www.linkcycles.com

                      Comment

                      • Jerry Wieland
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2006
                        • 2013

                        #12
                        Mark

                        I doubt that I am going to go that much for correctness -- I do not have that much time or money. I was just curious more than anything.


                        Originally posted by MMasa View Post
                        Ok Jerry, know what you need now.
                        If you are going for correctness and your frame is marked 23F xxxx, then the trans should have a letter L and while the serial numbers between the engine, frame, and transmission do not match, they tend to be somewhat close. In the neighborhood of within 100 to 500 of each other.
                        Mark

                        Comment

                        • MMasa
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2001
                          • 1192

                          #13
                          Jerry
                          I sent you an email but I'm not sure if I have ur current one. If you didn't get it, pm me with a correct one.
                          Thanks
                          Mark
                          Mark Masa
                          www.linkcycles.com

                          Comment

                          • JoJo357
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2016
                            • 3198

                            #14
                            Hello Jerry, nice score--if you're just building a rider, i have an early 20's J Motor and most of the trans/clutch laying around doing nothing. *M.A.D*

                            Comment

                            • Jerry Wieland
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2006
                              • 2013

                              #15
                              JoJo Thanks for the reply but I think I would like to stick with q 23/24 engine. I've got time and I will keep it in mind. Most of the JD stuff I own is 25 and newer but some would work.


                              Originally posted by JoJo357 View Post
                              Hello Jerry, nice score--if you're just building a rider, i have an early 20's J Motor and most of the trans/clutch laying around doing nothing. *M.A.D*

                              Comment

                              Working...