I have read that roundback 6's were not a part of vin # stamp codes on harley cases, but I have a 1937 that has one. The numbers otherwise appear very legit. The indicators behind this bike does not point to likelihood of tampering. Has anyone seen exception to the straightback versus roundback 6 statement. I have not studied enough prewar cases to know.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
vin numbers
Collapse
X
-
Jorrow
A “round back 6” would be correct for 1936.
“Straight back 6” was used in 1939
Im not sure when they changed with out doing some research, but I would think a round back 6 would probably be correct on your 1937.
It would be interesting to know what year and the approximate Vin number that the change took place?
Who has the earliest Vin number with the Straight back 6 ?
Pete reeves 860
Comment
-
Originally posted by jorrow View PostI have read that roundback 6's were not a part of vin # stamp codes on harley cases, but I have a 1937 that has one. The numbers otherwise appear very legit. The indicators behind this bike does not point to likelihood of tampering. Has anyone seen exception to the straightback versus roundback 6 statement. I have not studied enough prewar cases to know.
Comment
-
VIN 6s and 9s
Batteries are charged up! Gee. Only took two weeks!
Nah. Leeesa and I went all the way to Kin-tuck-EEE and back in the meantime.
Here are a couple of original case numbers, 36 and 37. There isn't much difference to see between the 6s or 9s in either of them. The 36 figure leans over to at least the center of the figure. Take a look.Last edited by Sargehere; 10-15-2008, 05:22 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ohio-Rider View PostMaybe my eyes ain't so good tonight Sarge, but to me the 6 in your 36 is a round back and the 6 in your 37 looks to be a straight back.
Comment
Comment