What came first?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lippy
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 114

    #1

    What came first?

    5051-15 Comparison.jpg
    Here are a couple of drawings that I made of a 1915 to 1934 Harley-Davidson tail light. They, as well as 50 pages of new drawings, will be in a VL Parts Catalog that I'm working on. What I hope is that someone will know which style came first and when did the change begin. They are identical in construction except for the riveted on horizontal piece that the license plate attaches to. Thanks, Lippy
  • exeric
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2005
    • 5950

    #2
    I believe this is the tail-light used by H-D from 1915 into circa '22.

    tlb.jpg
    Eric Smith
    AMCA #886

    Comment

    • duffeycycles
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 2007

      #3
      I think, 3 styles used 1915-1922 as Eric posted, 1923-1933 as you pictured on left only the bottom of the center should look like your right one, your right one is 1934-1938 tall box servicars & '34 singles...'34-'36 VL used a one piece bracket like '36-'38 BT

      Comment

      • Lippy
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2008
        • 114

        #4
        I agree, that’s the same tail light on my brothers 22. But I mis-spoke in my previous text. Harley reused the 5051-15 number up to 1934. I just grabbed my 22 to 27 Spare parts catalog and it shows the above left tailing, with the number 5051-15. Used from 15 to 27. It’s hard to document the pre war motorcycles without have an unmodified original as you reference.

        Comment

        • Rubone
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2004
          • 4762

          #5
          Lippy,
          If you need any parts book info I can look it up. I have most of the earlier ones too.
          DCP_4752 (2).JPG

          Robbie Knight Amca #2736

          Comment

          • Lippy
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2008
            • 114

            #6
            Thanks for the generous offer. I have all of what you pictured. In fact I’ve scanned them all into my computer for easy access. As you know the quality of the pictures in Harley parts catalogs greatly diminished after the teen years. Those in that era were great!

            Comment

            • Steve Slocombe
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2003
              • 2168

              #7
              The 5051-15 was a back dated part number as later styles of tail light fitted earlier models as replacements. Check my JD book for references. It was used until 1933, as 1934 took the new pattern tail light for the faired-in Art Deco rear mudguard until 1938. The 1935 domed red tail light glass was also later given a back dated part number as it was intended to replace the earlier flat style.

              Comment

              • BigLakeBob
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2010
                • 2757

                #8
                Originally posted by duffeycycles View Post
                I think, 3 styles used 1915-1922 as Eric posted, 1923-1933 as you pictured on left only the bottom of the center should look like your right one, your right one is 1934-1938 tall box servicars & '34 singles...'34-'36 VL used a one piece bracket like '36-'38 BT
                Why only '34-'38 tall box servi cars, not small box? Did '38 servi cars not use the one piece bracket like BT? I have a '38 left fender and it has the 3 mounting holes not 2. Piecing together a '38 and trying to figure things out. Thanks.
                Bob Rice #6738

                Comment

                • duffeycycles
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 2007

                  #9
                  GD is tall box, GDT is tall box & towbar. My '38 GDT tail lights, both are '23-'33 style with a different license mount, one with optional brake light, one without. Also shown as replacement for '15-'33. Still using the 1915 part number in 1940 parts book. Yes '34-'38 small box did use the same tail light as other models '34-'38

                  img674.jpg 485764867_3998758127036683_5064331281001383840_n.jpg 485310067_3998758003703362_3840974711493765988_n.jpg 485153973_3998758160370013_5830188413753372522_n.jpg
                  Last edited by duffeycycles; 04-05-2026, 08:20 AM.

                  Comment

                  • duffeycycles
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 2007

                    #10
                    Bob, I think the tall box fenders have a different shape at the front where it meets the box.

                    Comment

                    • BigLakeBob
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 2757

                      #11
                      image_52116.jpg image_52117.jpg This is my repop taillight from, (I believe Bud Hopkins?). Would this be correct for '38G short box? The curviture doesn't fit my fender exactly, maybe it just needs tweaked or was there a taillight for BT's and one for other models? Fender curviture the same for BT and servi's?

                      The fenders I bought seperately and the box was acquired seperately. Each side fender mounting holes line up to the box. Is there a way to tell if I have the correct fenders for a short box?

                      Sorry to hijack the thread. Thanks for any info!

                      Edit, just read Bruce's, should have before asking the fender question. I believe I have the correct fenders because of the valance to take up the space.
                      Last edited by BigLakeBob; 04-05-2026, 10:54 AM.
                      Bob Rice #6738

                      Comment

                      • Rubone
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 4762

                        #12
                        Bob, I can't answer your question but the '39 up taillight is different radius back for Solo or Servi-Car use so earlier is likely as well.
                        Robbie Knight Amca #2736

                        Comment

                        • Lippy
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2008
                          • 114

                          #13
                          In my research on VL tail lights, I'm finding that a Stop Light in 1934 was a factory option when you ordered your motorcycle. If this option wasn't ordered did you receive the 5051-34 single filament version or perhaps the 5051-51?

                          Is my drawing and notation correct below. Number 2 drawing, then was never used on a VL?

                          Thanks to all, Lippy



                          Tail light in the 30s.jpg

                          Comment

                          • duffeycycles
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 2007

                            #14
                            #2 is '34-'38 GD not '33-'38. They didn't offer the tall box before '34. Stoplights were an option in the US until 1939 when they became mandatory. They were not mandatory in all English speaking countries. If you look at my '38 GDT lights, one has a deeper bulb socket for the dual filament bulb. That option on the early style lights are not shown in the parts books. On '39-'46 lights show a part number for single filament & different number on dual filament & the same 2 options for the servicar with different profile. Another note is there was stamped letters on '23-'33 tailight brackets & no letters stamped on my '34-'38 GD brackets. The difference in shape of Solo lights vs shape of Servicar lights in '39 that Robbie mentioned was servicars lack of the fender flip. The fender shape was different on servicars at that point on the fenders. The lights were the same shape & part # on all twins except tall box servicar '34-'38.

                            Comment

                            • Lippy
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 114

                              #15
                              Thanks again to all. Here’s the stamped lettering for reference

                              IMG_0294.jpeg

                              Comment

                              Working...