Two bikes in the Wauseon Ohio show.  Both bikes are 1911 model year. 
The question is, during the awards ceremony, which bike receives both the oldest bike award and earns a century medallion and which bike receives no recognition. Bike A, a bike not run all weekend and pushed in and out of the judging area. Or bike B, the bike that was prominently displayed and rode throughout the entire weekend?
Answer: If you guessed Bike A you have the same opinion of the AMCA judges. If you guessed bike B. you must guess again.
I fully understand why so many long term AMCA member/bike builders no longer display bikes in the judging area.
Joe
					The question is, during the awards ceremony, which bike receives both the oldest bike award and earns a century medallion and which bike receives no recognition. Bike A, a bike not run all weekend and pushed in and out of the judging area. Or bike B, the bike that was prominently displayed and rode throughout the entire weekend?
Answer: If you guessed Bike A you have the same opinion of the AMCA judges. If you guessed bike B. you must guess again.
I fully understand why so many long term AMCA member/bike builders no longer display bikes in the judging area.
Joe
							
						
, BUT this is how it should have been handled
. the owner of "bike A" should have been asked to start the bike, if it did not run the tag should have been changed to "display only" the century medallion is given to ANY and ALL bikes on the field that are 100 years old or older. (that means judged and display only). as for the oldest bike, I would have given it to the runner
, BUT again any bike on the field (judged or display only) is eligible, so the award should go to the bike with the lowest serial number. you should have at the very least also received a Century Medallion.
							
						
Comment