I haven’t tried the Caswell but I bought a can of Eastwood spray cad and in my opinion it looked horrible. Harleys heat resistant silver spray paint looked more realistic than the Eastwood. I doubt there’s much difference between Caswell and Eastwood.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2 Sets of Spokes - 16 inch
Collapse
X
-
I know you guys are looking for exact, but doesn't the AMCA judging guide allow stainless spokes after bead blasting to substitute for cad plating?AMCA #41287
2020 Heritage Classic 114
1989 Springer Softail project
1972 FX Boattail Night Train
1972 Sportster project
1971 Sprint SS350 project
1982 FXR - AMCA 99.25 point restoration
1979 FXS 1200 never done playing
1998 Dyna Convertible - 100% Original
96" Evo Softail self built chopper
2012 103" Road King "per diem"
plus 13 other bikes over the years...
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by joe fxs fxr View PostI know you guys are looking for exact, but doesn't the AMCA judging guide allow stainless spokes after bead blasting to substitute for cad plating?
Askin' for a friend, of course.
....CottenAMCA #776
Dumpster Diver's Motto: Seek,... and Ye Shall Find!
Comment
-
They still deduct for wrong nipples I think. I remember a statement from Don D (past chief judge), about the nipples. His said he can walk around about any swap meet and aquire correct nipples. I agree, whether you have to buy a complete junk wheel or not, they are still out there. Re plating required probably. Lastest Palmers shows the difference I believe.Bob Rice #6738
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by T. Cotten View Post
So we should lower our expectations, Joe?
Askin' for a friend, of course.
....Cotten
Originally posted by BigLakeBob View PostThey still deduct for wrong nipples I think. I remember a statement from Don D (past chief judge), about the nipples. His said he can walk around about any swap meet and aquire correct nipples. I agree, whether you have to buy a complete junk wheel or not, they are still out there. Re plating required probably. Lastest Palmers shows the difference I believe.Last edited by joe fxs fxr; 04-07-2025, 08:31 AM.AMCA #41287
2020 Heritage Classic 114
1989 Springer Softail project
1972 FX Boattail Night Train
1972 Sportster project
1971 Sprint SS350 project
1982 FXR - AMCA 99.25 point restoration
1979 FXS 1200 never done playing
1998 Dyna Convertible - 100% Original
96" Evo Softail self built chopper
2012 103" Road King "per diem"
plus 13 other bikes over the years...
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by joe fxs fxr View PostI know you guys are looking for exact, but doesn't the AMCA judging guide allow stainless spokes after bead blasting to substitute for cad plating?Originally posted by T. Cotten View PostSo we should lower our expectations, Joe?
....CottenOriginally posted by joe fxs fxr View PostNot at all! That's why I started the sentence the way I did. But this topic will be read by many people in the future, and I wanted your opinions on the subject to be known. CAD plating is getting harder and harder to find....
The judges have lowered their expectations beyond "you guys".
Believe me, Folks, I'm all for faking it, and always have been.
But if it takes a loophole to get away with it, it ain't faked very well, is it?
....CottenLast edited by T. Cotten; 04-07-2025, 10:11 AM.AMCA #776
Dumpster Diver's Motto: Seek,... and Ye Shall Find!
Comment
-
Hey Joe,
They only accept the stainless if they look like Cad. Also all the stainless are the wrong thread for the correct nipple. So very difficult to fool the judges with the stainless spokes. The wrong nipples are easy to spot. I helped Don D at Daytona this year and we found most wrong rim, spoke or nipple. Full point deduct each wheel.
When I look at a restored bike and see the wrong wheels or even a wrong seat post, I walk away knowing it isn't a well restored bike. I love seeing when someone goes to the trouble to get it right.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by marksg View PostHey Joe,
They only accept the stainless if they look like Cad. Also all the stainless are the wrong thread for the correct nipple. So very difficult to fool the judges with the stainless spokes. The wrong nipples are easy to spot. I helped Don D at Daytona this year and we found most wrong rim, spoke or nipple. Full point deduct each wheel.
When I look at a restored bike and see the wrong wheels or even a wrong seat post, I walk away knowing it isn't a well restored bike. I love seeing when someone goes to the trouble to get it right.
Much less the judges....
It used to be that bikes were judged to help them along the way.
Please explain if you are a judge, why you would walk away? Thanks,
...Cotten
AMCA #776
Dumpster Diver's Motto: Seek,... and Ye Shall Find!
Comment
-
Originally posted by marksg View PostHey Joe,
They only accept the stainless if they look like Cad. Also all the stainless are the wrong thread for the correct nipple. So very difficult to fool the judges with the stainless spokes. The wrong nipples are easy to spot. I helped Don D at Daytona this year and we found most wrong rim, spoke or nipple. Full point deduct each wheel.
When I look at a restored bike and see the wrong wheels or even a wrong seat post, I walk away knowing it isn't a well restored bike. I love seeing when someone goes to the trouble to get it right.AMCA #41287
2020 Heritage Classic 114
1989 Springer Softail project
1972 FX Boattail Night Train
1972 Sportster project
1971 Sprint SS350 project
1982 FXR - AMCA 99.25 point restoration
1979 FXS 1200 never done playing
1998 Dyna Convertible - 100% Original
96" Evo Softail self built chopper
2012 103" Road King "per diem"
plus 13 other bikes over the years...
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by marksg View PostHey Joe,
They only accept the stainless if they look like Cad. Also all the stainless are the wrong thread for the correct nipple. So very difficult to fool the judges with the stainless spokes. The wrong nipples are easy to spot. I helped Don D at Daytona this year and we found most wrong rim, spoke or nipple. Full point deduct each wheel.
When I look at a restored bike and see the wrong wheels or even a wrong seat post, I walk away knowing it isn't a well restored bike. I love seeing when someone goes to the trouble to get it right.
The reason to get it right is not for judging of personal sentiments.
Thanks also for the input regarding the spokes and nipples.
Comment
-
Sorry Cotten, I didn't explain well. Two different cases.
If helping judge, it would be a simple point deduction.
If I am looking over a vintage restored bike, I start looking for the wrong parts or more correctly I start noticing the correct parts. When I see that someone has gone to the trouble to reuse or acquire the correct parts (i.e. spokes, nipples, pogo, wiring, headlamp & proper plating) I spend more time enjoying the restoration. When the obvious parts are not correct, I usually walk on by quickly.
I am pretty new to this hobby but I have sourced the correct date codes for the rims I will need to have re-chromed as well as found the correct spokes I will need to have cad plated.
For me, that is the fun with this hobby. Knowing the date code on a rim that no one will ever see.
- 1 like
Comment
Comment